|
Cities around the world are increasingly including green infrastructure in their policy to build « sustainable » cities due to their assumed ecological benefits. However, it is not always clear if green infrastructure delivers the ecological benefits policy claims it does. We selected an increasingly popular type of green infrastructure, green alleyways, and tested if these can provide ecological benefits in cities. To test this, we conducted ecological surveys in green alleyways in the Villeray-Saint Michel-Parc Extension neighbourhood in Montreal and in Trois-Rivieres, to assess habitat provisioning, temperature mitigation, tree abundance and diversity, vegetative complexity, and capacity for service-based traits. We worked in collaboration with teams at UdeM and UQAM, who performed qualitative interviews with residents, quantitative surveys with residents, and landscape architecture assessments of the ruelles. Overall, we found that green alleyways can provide a range of ecological benefits, but the number and capacity of these benefits highly depend on the management regime.
|
The Balcony Garden project is a participatory science project exploring the potential of balconies as green space for urban biodiversity conservation. For the pilot study in 2024, we are exploring the capacity of balcony gardens to support Monarch butterflies. Therefore, we are recruiting balconies from boroughs with currently high Monarch butterfly observations in Hochelaga-Maisonneuve, Rosemont-La Petite-Patrie, Le Sud-Ouest, Verdun, and Lachine. Interested balcony-owners can submit information about their balcony to see if their balcony meets the conditions for the experiment.
We will also be recruiting participants to help us test the growth of native or naturalized plant species that are also pollinator-friendly, to better understand what other pollinator plants can be grown on balconies. |
|
|
The capacity for ecosystem services in a particular neighbourhood or city is determined by many different drivers, such as tree diversity. We hypothesize that across cities, there are some common drivers, i.e., cross-city drivers, that influence the ecosystem service capacity provided by urban trees in a consistent way. Determining the cross-city drivers of ecosystem services could allow urban planners and other stakeholders to understand the ecology and plan effectively before ever planting a tree, thus contributing to an increased ability to plan healthy and equitable cities.
Our research specifically asks: What are the cross-city drivers of regulatory ecosystem service capacity across Canada? We use publicly available data to test ecosystem services and their drivers in seven cities that span a longitudinal gradient across Canada using a multi-scale, multi-service approach. We test ecological, built, and sociodemographic drivers of three ecosystem services, air temperature regulation, air pollution mitigation, and carbon storage, at a fine-scale (street level), medium-scale (neighbourhood level), and large-scale (city level) across the cities. Cities are highly dynamic and heterogeneous, varying on a uniquely fine-scale. Therefore, the capacity of the urban landscape to deliver ecosystem services is also highly spatially heterogeneous. Our multi-scale, multi-city, multi-service approach captures the importance of heterogeneity in urban landscapes and seeks to deliver greater understanding of our urban trees, and the benefits they provide urban residents. |
|
Urban forests are characterized by relationships between people and trees, where urban trees provide benefits to people and people make decisions impacting trees. People’s perceptions of urban forests are related to the cognitive processes that underpin benefits received from trees, while also influencing support for or against trees and their management. Our study builds on a previously done cross-city analysis to more deeply investigate the relationships between language, city type, and socioeconomic status with multiple perception responses associated with urban forests (i.e., values and beliefs). We conducted an online survey about urban forest perceptions in and around Montreal, allowing us to explore perceptions between regions, locations on an urban gradient and language spoken.
|
|
Cities are temporally dynamic ecosystems that experience continuous redevelopment over time. Development patterns often reflect the power structures and inequities that shape our societies. Urban parks are developed on different land-use types, and are susceptible to inequitable development patterns, past and present. Urban parks also provide critical benefits to resident wellbeing and contain natural elements that are susceptible to the effects of historical decision making.
|
|
Urban green infrastructure – the network of greenspaces across cities – provides ecosystem services that are important for urban sustainability. Because of this, cities are increasingly redeveloping underused alleys into green infrastructure to improve ecosystem service capacity. But it remains unclear if these green alleys are delivering on the promise of supplying particular ecosystem services.
|